Week 15: To test or not to test. Is it a question?
Last night I looked in the mirror and thought, “whoa! Where did that belly come from!?”
Looks like Baby Flo-Bix is starting to flesh out a bit. We’re up to a fetus the size of an apple floating around in there. I still cannot get over the strangeness of carrying around a four inch creature wherever I go. Most of the time I’m not even thinking about it and even when I do it still seems impossible. All the evidence of these things unseen has been external (ultrasound, Doppler). I think when this babe actually starts kicking around and I come to realize there’s actually something in there, I will be blown away.
One of the conversation any pregnant woman runs into time and again with her physician/midwife is around genetic testing. At our very first, 8-week appointment the doc sat us down and laid out at all the options we would have for testing over the next few months. As first time parents we listened intently and tried to think about what was best for our family. My thinking was, if we do have a fragile baby then maybe that means I will have to carry it differently or go on bed rest. Maybe she’s asking us this because the baby will need immediate surgery or I’ll need need to make dietary changes.
If you’ve been here before I’m sure you are shaking your head at our naivety. When I asked the doctor those questions she looked at me a bit in awe. “Um, no, well you wouldn’t do anything different.” “Then why would we want to get tested?” “You would, hmm, uh, need to decide if you want to….continue the pregnancy.”
Whoa. This woman who brings babies into the world for a living just asked if we would want to terminate my pregnancy because our child would be born with a sickness or disability. Once we assured her that we had no intention of ending the pregnancy regardless of outcome she told us genetic testing wasn’t something we needed to pursue. This conversation has been repeated at every other prenatal appointment (we switched to a midwife in SW WA) and hospital sponsored class we have been to.
What’s incredible is the moral neutrality presented in the option. When the care provider frames it as “information that you will need to decide how to act upon,” there is no expectation that you could make a wrong decision. Whether something as simple as a physical deformity like cleft palate or a life-threatening genetic disorder like trisomy 13, you can do what you want. I continue to be baffled by the idea that people inculturated to expect perfection and independence as their inalienable right would be morally qualified to make a decision about a child who will put these rights into question with every moment of her life.
One of the suggestions for early screening and diagnosis, an argument put out by Commonweal after the introduction of a 1st trimester DS screen three years ago, is that these tests help parents change their expectations about their birth and prepare them early for the new challenges of caring for an infant with a disability. I wonder, shouldn’t that always be our expectation? Should we ever go into a pregnancy “hoping for the best” as if “the best” meant the type of baby the world conditioned us to believe was our right?
To be fair, I would be truly devastated by a condition which caused suffering for our child, particularly something like trisomy 18 or cystic fibrosis. But our reaction to a Down Syndrome baby would be completely different. These friends we have with DS are wonderfully flawed and gifted individuals, just like any person. But this gets back to the central question: are we expecting in the way we should be expecting?
It will take a lot of grace and prayer for us to be ready to welcome a child with a fatal disorder like trisomy 18 and I pray every day that we won’t have to say goodbye to our baby within hours or days of its birth. At the same time, I don’t find myself asking God to protect us against a child with spina bifida, MS or Downs. It just feels morally wrong for people who were nurtured and discipled in L’Arche to pray in that way.
In my less faithful moments I am scared out of my mind about the hospital costs associated with a fragile child. I grieve to imagine the deep prejudice our child will face in a world that would have aborted him. But I also believe there is more grace in us than I know and that we have been prepared by L’Arche, our church and our family to say “yes” to whatever gift we are given.
So, should Christians be screening in pregnancy?
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: baby, disability






I do not believe there is anything wrong with screening when you are using it as a tool to prepare *if* you have a child with a disability. There are disabilities that it would be nice to have a “heads-up” about so that parents could prepare the house, nursery, vehicle, etc. for any special needs that might arise.
My first child was diagnosed at 19 weeks gest. with anencephaly and I wouldn’t have known it had I not tested. I was able to prepare myself and my family for the death of our child while still carrying her. My son was born with health problems that we could not have known about, with or without testing, and I felt so lost not knowing what was going on or what to expect.
There definately *is* room in the Christian pregnancy for testing if used as a tool for preparing and not as a way to customize a baby.
Good luck to you and your family and God Bless!
asxaviergrows: thanks for sharing your story.
I’m wondering, with your daughter did you have to have an amnio to confirm the diagnosis? I know that the albeit small chance of of hurting the baby sometimes deters moms from the procedure.
We’ve also been told that most disorders with the baby would become evident in later ultrasounds. Was that true in your case or would you not have only known through the testing you received?
I actually only had the blood test (AFP) done in the case of my daughter. Now they do the “quad screen” which is also just a blood test of the mother. It’s not invasive at all. They offered us the amnio and even though we knew there was *something* wrong, I would not risk the slight chance at that point. The actual diagnosis was done by ultrasound…we were told anencephaly is the only thing they can diagnose 100% by ultrasound.
I was given two options for “what to do”. I could let the pregnancy continue or I could induce labor to end it. Turns out that I didn’t have to *make* that decision. She lost her heartbeat within a week of the diagnosis and I delivered her at 20 weeks 2 days.
I’m SO thankful that there’s been so many advances in prenatal care that they’re seeing fewer and fewer babies that are unable to be helped at all.
Prayers that yours is among the majority of those wonderfully healthy babies!
Hey Melissa,

So now I am addicted to your blog.
Having just gone through this whole pregnancy/childbirth experience recently, I am interested in your take on all of this. Sandy and I decided not to do any screenings. So often there are false positives in the early screenings…I just couldn’t see putting myself through the heartache and stress of a false positive, having to retest, etc. Especially because we already knew that we would not terminate the pregnancy regardless of what a screening said. And, for me, I just felt like a screening didn’t have the final word on the health of our child. I knew I was never going to be prepared for parenthood, frankly! (And I was right.)
I’m praying for you as you head into these murky and blessed waters of parental decision-making!
Kristin - Thanks for the input about you and Sandy (by the by, I don’t think your baby looks anything like Sandy! Has anyone else said that?).
We’re pretty sure we’ll opt out. We definitely wouldn’t follow up with the amnio so I agree that it wouldn’t be worth it to go through the false positives heartache.
This is a great post, Melissa. Dave and I wavered on this one and ultimately did decide to test, in the spirit of “let’s be as prepared as we can.” In retrospect, I don’t think it mattered one iota. Ultimately, the preparation that saved our sanity during Clara’s untimely birth and hospitalization was that of “preparing to be un-prepared.” I read an amazing chapter in a wonderful book called Birthing From Within on the compassionate use of epidurals and cesarean section (this is a very pro-natural childbirth book) that reminded me that anything can happen with child birth (and care) and that the best way to be ready is to open yourself spiritually, physically and emotionally to the unknown of the experience.
I totally agree with you. I was appalled that this was even offered to us (presumably in the same spirit in which it was offered to you).
I think as an act of protest against the moral neutrality with which terminating a pregnancy is viewed, Christians should not test.
okay–so my cousin who is a medical doctor was pregant with baby 2 (of now 3) and was told her son would be severely disabled and physically handicapped and that they should abort the fetus. she and her husband are christians and had no intention of doing so. later in the pregnancy, when things still looked bad, she asked to see her chart and noticed that her doctor listed her as a “non-compliant” patient because she chose life!!!
little samuel jude was born with a tumor on his brain stem and had some “markers” for cancer. he turns 3 this weekend and is perfectly normal, fine, and wonderful, thanks in my personal opinion to LOADS of prayer.
i’m with you melissa–pregnancy should be a state of “prepare for the unexpected” whether we are talking about what happens during labor or the result of your child’s health at birth. i have just heard too many false positive stories to trust testing. my MAIN concern is someday some politican fed by insurance companies will pass a law that if a parent doesn’t abort, the child’s medical expenses won;t be covered by insurance, truly devastating…